![]() It’s a terrific tool, complete with predefined keyboard shortcuts if you want to copy content from one app to another. With Magnet, you can drag and snap windows to the edges and corners of your screen, which will then lock into place. The app is made for the multitasking Mac user inside all of us and presents a quick way to arrange your desktop. It’s not always easy to view multiple windows side by side, but Magnet gives you tons of options. Magnet Image used with permission by copyright holder You can choose a four-week free trial before purchasing. The latest version added support for macOS Monterey and M1 devices, a quick reveal to show/hide apps, and the ability to adjust the icon sizes. You can also search for specific items or move them into the optional Bartender Bar if you’re in dire need of additional space. It’s a subtle tool that’s specifically designed with organization in mind, and as such, it lets you better systematize various aspects of your interface. Put simply, it lets you choose which apps appear in the menu bar and rearrange their position to your liking. Note that Amphetamine no longer works with versions of macOS before Yosemite.īartender 4 Image used with permission by copyright holderīartender 4 is an app made for when you’re utilizing too many apps. It’s ideal for Mac users who want to watch streams, videos, or any other activity in which they don’t touch the keyboard or mouse for an extended period. Version 4 improves the workflow creator, introduces rich text snippets, and more.Īmphetamine Image used with permission by copyright holderĪlways a favorite, Amphetamine keeps your computer from going into sleep mode, starting the screensaver, or performing the auto-dim function. It’s a Mac app that fills the gap between Siri and your Spotlight search by allowing you to automate tasks and perform advanced functions that, frankly, Siri should be able to handle on its own. ![]() The Apple M1's GPU prowess also has an inordinate impact on these test results, with Chrome both native and x86_64 translated on the M1 outrunning Chrome on the Ryzen U powered HP EliteBook.Best VPN services 2023: today’s top picksĩ best desktop computers of 2023: tested and reviewedġ0 best laptops of 2023: tested and reviewed Safari enjoys an absolutely crushing advantage on this test, more than doubling even M1-native Chrome's performance. Chrome x86_64 under Rosetta2 takes a significant back seat to everything else here-though we want to again stress that it does not feel at all slow and would perform quite well compared to nearly any other system.įinally, MotionMark 1.1 measures complex graphic animation techniques in-browser and nothing else. This is the closest thing to a "traditional" outside-the-browser benchmark and is the most relevant for general Web applications of all kinds-particularly heavy office applications such as spreadsheets with tons of columns, rows, and formulae but also graphic editors with local rather than cloud processing. Jetstream2 is the broadest of the three benchmarks and includes workloads for data sorting, regular expression parsing, graphic ray tracing, and more. ![]() Speedometer shows a massive advantage for M1 silicon running natively, whether Safari or Chrome Chrome x86_64 run through Rosetta2 is inconsequentially slower than Chrome running on a brand-new HP EliteBook with Ryzen U CPU. This is probably the most relevant benchmark of the three for "regular webpage," if such a thing exists. The first benchmark in our gallery above, Speedometer, is the most prosaic-the only thing it does is populate lists of menu items, over and over, using a different Web-application framework each time. dmg is available today, and-as expected-it's significantly faster if you're doing something complicated enough in your browser to notice. That was and still is a true statement we find it difficult to believe anyone using the non-native binary for Chrome under an M1 machine would find it "slow." That said, Google's newer, ARM-native. Further Reading Hands-on with the Apple M1-a seriously fast x86 competitor In our earlier testing, we declared that the previous version of Google Chrome-which was available only as an x86_64 binary and needed to be run using Rosetta 2-was perfectly fine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |